The Hidden Computer That Automatically Predicts The Winning Number

1. Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landfall
2. Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landed
3. Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Lands
4. Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Land Christopher Pawlicki
5. Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landslide

By using the camera’s technology and data, they were able to more accurately predict where the ball ended up. As noted in their paper, Predicting the Outcome of Roulette, the team used the digital camera to get measurements of the wheel/ball conditions. They ran 700 “trials” to test their model on predicting where the ball would land. (ISNS) - If you want to beat the house at roulette, it helps to think like a physicist. A simple model of the motion of a roulette wheel and ball, based on physics principles and confirmed by experiments on an actual wheel, has revealed two ways of overcoming the usual odds against roulette players.

Point a hidden camera at the wheel, and a computer tells you where the ball will land . . . sound like a fantasy? It’s not. It’s the Hybrid Roulette Computer – by far the most effective roulette prediction device available anywhere, and the most effective way to win at roulette. It is no exaggeration to say this technology makes millions.

If the wear & tear are very pronounced, the dominant diamonds will be so obvious that you can predict with a high degree of accuracy where the ball will land. 3- Design Yes, manufacturers go above and beyond to design optimally random roulette wheels.

1. Point a hidden camera at the wheel, and a computer tells you where the ball will land. Sound like a fantasy? It’s the Hybrid Roulette Computer – by far the most effective roulette prediction device available anywhere, and the most effective way to win at roulette. It is no exaggeration to say this technology makes millions.
2. The prediction of the winning number in a roulette game depends largely on the end speed of the ball before it stops, which is usually the same in every spin. The game result is, therefore, not much affected by things like how fast or slow a dealer spins the wheel as the end speed of the ball will always be the same.

The Hybrid is not available anywhere else. Although we use it ourselves, there are too many casinos world-wide for us to apply it in all casinos, so we can sell a few of them publicly. The Hybrid can and likely will earn you millions if it’s used correctly. The technology is not to be taken lightly. We do not offer it to just anyone – you must meet us personally and meet specific requirements.

Below are some video demonstrations. But you can see a demonstration in-person and on any wheel you want. We can also show you videos of real play in real casinos (shown to serious players only).

Why The Hybrid Roulette Computer Is Most Profitable

The Hybrid is designed for high stakes play (high rollers), and for players who manage teams of players throughout the world. The full capabilities of the hybrid are only disclosed if you visit us or see a private demo. Some notable capabilities are explained below:

• Automatic wheel and ball speed detection: it doesn’t get tired or make mistakes. It’s always accurate.

• Auto hidden camera-aiming: you only need to face the camera in the general direction of the wheel, and the camera aims at the wheel itself.

• Accurate predictions within 3 seconds of ball release: almost always predictions are early enough

• Most accurate predictions: accuracy is often twice as high as the next top model (Uber version computer)

• Can send predictions to any amount of players: you can have just 1 bettor, or even 5 if you want. Each connected player automatically receives unique numbers to bet. More players means more bets are placed, and the team is out of the casino in less time. For example, a team of 3 bettors can cover 15 numbers per spin, and win over 90% of spins.

• No important equipment is needed in the casino: the phone sends video outside the casino to a server in another country. There is nothing important or expensive players need to take into the casino. If players are searched, nothing unusual is found.

• Much quicker to use: Usually you start to beat the wheel after about 5-10 spins of play, and your edge gets stronger. The Hybrid learns how the ball behaves and bounces in much less time than the next best mode (the Uber version). So teams can be out of casinos with their profit in even 30 minutes of play. Although with higher stakes play, it is safer to test more spins to fully know how profitable the wheel is before making large bets. Even then it’s still much quicker to use the other computers.

• Manage unlimited teams throughout the world: Normally to maximize winnings (millions), teams need to frequently change casinos to avoid detection. But the Hybrid allows you to have as many different teams as you want, throughout the world. All the players need is basic equipment such as common smartphones. So you could have a team in each country if you want, and give a new team access to the Hybrid each day. The teams pay you part of their winnings. This way it’s like buying multiple roulette computers and giving them to your partners throughout the world to split profits.

The Hybrid is for larger and more serious teams who aim to win very large sums. You get predictions earlier. Accuracy is higher, and you can earn much more than with typical computers.

VIDEO: Demonstration of Accuracy on 2017 Model Huxley Wheel

in this video we start applying the roulette computer from scratch, so you see most of the process. The audio is censored. To monitor the accuracy, pay attention to the “tuned predictions” displayed in the software. The tuned predictions begin to be displayed after the first few spins. Predictions become more accurate over time, and reach the maximum accuracy after about 70 spins. At that point, the players usually start betting. In this demo, after we test the 70 spins, we clear the charts and repeat more spins so you can see what the accuracy would be like once betting begins. Keep in mind this is a current model Juhn Huxley wheel and with a deliberately bouncy ivorine ball, to make winning more difficult than most wheels.

Summary of Results

Calculating The Edge

The most reliable assessment of edge is by observing the center points of the peaks (the high parts of the wavey green line for the chart with the most data). In this case the high points are at 2.95 and 2.25. So the edge is approximately +34%. This is about the average edge for a difficult wheel that’s in good condition, and with a bouncy ivorine ball like in the video. Obviously even better results are achieved if you take the time to focus on easier wheels. Edges over +90% are often achieved especially if the computer is configured to notify players when the ball is predicted to bounce ess predictably (but this setting takes longer to use).

But more important than edge is “profit per hour”. And normally we would bet about 5 numbers for each predicted number (the predicted number and 2 numbers each side). In 70 spins, the profit was $6,800. In the 29 spins, the profit was $1,750. The edge in the betting period was lower than expected (as per the longer term data). This is what we’d call “bad luck”, although it’s still a clear profit. Hypothetically we could have bet on 15 or so numbers and won on almost every spin for an even greater profit. But this is not possible on all wheels. Usually a well-organized team can get 5-10 numbers down in a spin before bets close.

There’s a lot more to it, but the video is a just a basic demonstration of typical accuracy on a very common wheel.

How The Camera is Hidden

Typically we use pinhole pens cameras, although we can also use the phone’s internal camera. Below is an example of a pinhole pens:

We can also use powerful zoom lenses, although the phone’s software already uses digital zoom, and automatically aims at the wheel even from a distance.

Sketpical? See a Personal Demonstration and You’ll See Everything

Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landfall

We have conducted many demonstrations of our technology to both large and small audiences. This includes the roulettephysics.com roulette system, and our electronic technology. On most occasions though, group sizes range from 1 to 15 individuals.

Image left: One of our demonstrators exhibiting our Hybrid Roulette Computer. The actual camera for the Hybrid can be miniature and kept close to the wheel, or hidden as far as 50 meters from the wheel. It can even obtain a view of the wheel from ceiling reflections to ensure line-of-sight.

We prefer to keep groups small and personal. Demonstrations to larger audiences are more to establish clear proof of effectiveness with many witnesses, whereas demos to smaller audiences are more for serious players who have intent to purchase our technology. If you are seeing a demonstration with intent to purchase, you are required to sign a non-disclosure agreement, and there are other requirements specified on the purchase page.

If you are merely curious, you can attend a larger group demo, although such public demonstrations are censored, and you only see what you need to see to know without a doubt our claims are accurate. For example, at a larger group demo, you will clearly see accuracy rates of 1 in 10-15, but you will not be permitted to inspect the equipment or be privy to information relating to its operation. But if you attend a personal demo with intent to purchase, you will see everything.

Additionally, at any of our demonstrations, you can see other roulette cheating devices – you can test them personally and decide for yourself if competing devices are scams. Most roulette computer devices are scams and only capable of beating old or poorly maintained wheels. At our public demonstrations, you will also see the roulettephysics.com roulette system which does not use any form of electronics, and is legal throughout the world. It can be applied at some online casinos depending on footage quality, but it is more designed for real casinos. See recommended site for online casino comparisons.

Image left: demonstration of other cheating devices available. How they work and why they are ineffective.

If you wish to purchase censored video or audio of a public demonstration, or to attend a public or private demonstration, please contact us.

How Effective is the Hybrid?

Once the camera is aimed, the equipment automatically predicts where the ball is most likely to land. The ball and wheel speed is measured automatically, so there is no human error involved, and user skill or fatigue is irrelevant. This enables extremely accurate and early predictions to win, without many manual clicks of a button (as is traditionally done), and without the user needing to even look at the wheel.

Predictions are relayed to one or more players, and if you bet on just one number, you win once about every 10-15 spins, without even needing to look at the wheel. This is an enormous edge over the casino, and it’s completely covert. Accuracy rates vary, but the typical edge is between 40 – 120%.

But is it LEGAL?

Contrary to popular belief, this computer system is actually LEGAL in approximately half of the world’s casinos. This is because most gaming laws state that a player may not force or influence the outcome of spins, but they do not at all state your cannot “predict” spins. This provides Hybrid players with a unique and perfectly legal strategy for earning potentially millions (literally millions). It will not be an opportunity that will last forever though.

But legal or not, of course casinos don’t like you applying such technology to beat roulette. If they find you are using a cheating device, they can and will likely ban you. This is why such cheating devices must be applied covertly.

Purchasers are told exactly where the device is legal as per the latest research. However, purchasers should always do their own research for confirmation.

How Much Does it Cost?

There are different versions of the Hybrid, and many equipment options available. Ultimately the options you choose determines the price. The approximate price range varies between US$25,000 – US$80,000, which is a small price considering your investment can be returned within 24hrs of play (However, realistically you should not win too much too soon – you should win discretely to avoid detection).

To maintain secrets, you need to visit us personally to discuss the full range of options. The pricing is below:

Browse our site and learn more. To acquire our Hybrid, please first Contact Us to schedule a meeting in person with us. You will witness a full demonstration on a real wheel and see full capabilities before purchasing. If you are not interested in electronic devices, learn about the roulettephysics.com roulette system.

“It’s not a matter of how much you can win, it’s how much you can win without drawing undue attention.”

Is it possible to win at the roulette tables? There are people who have actually, provably managed to do so. Despite many proposed “systems” there are only two profitable ways to play roulette. One can either exploit an unbalanced wheel, or one can exploit the inherently deterministic nature of the spin of both ball and wheel. Casinos will do their utmost to avoid the first type of exploit. The second exploit is possible because placing wagers on the outcome is traditionally permitted until some time after the ball and wheel are in motion. That is, one has an opportunity to observe the motion of both the ball and the wheel before placing a wager.

Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landed

Taking advantage of biased wheels

Unbalanced wheel

Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Lands

The archetypal tale of the first type of exploit is that of a man by the name of Jagger (various sources refer to him as either William Jaggers or Joseph Jagger, or some permutation of these). Jagger, an English mechanic and amateur mathematician, observed that slight mechanical imperfection in a roulette wheel could afford sufficient edge to provide for profitable play. According to one incarnation of the tale, in 1873 he embarked for the casino of Monte Carlo with six hired assistants. Once there, he carefully logged the outcome of each spin of each of six roulette tables over a period of five weeks. Analysis of the data revealed that for each wheel there was a unique but systematic bias. Exploiting these weaknesses he gambled profitably for a week before the casino management shuffled the wheels between tables. This bought his winning streak to a sudden halt. However, he soon noted various distinguishing features of the individual wheels and was able to follow them between tables, again winning consistently. Eventually the casino resorted to re- distributing the individual partitions between pockets. A popular account, published in 1925, claims he eventually came away with winnings of £65,0008. The success of this endeavor is one possible inspiration for the musical hall song “The Man Who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo” although this is strongly disputed.

Statistical analysis

Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Land Christopher Pawlicki

Similar feats have been repeated elsewhere. The noted statistician Karl Pearson provided a statistical analysis of roulette data, and found it to exhibit substantial systematic bias. However, it appears that his analysis was based on flawed data from unscrupulous scribes (apparently he had hired rather lazy journalists to collect the data).

Irregularities

In 1947 irregularities were found, and exploited, by two students, Albert Hibbs and Roy Walford, from Chicago University. Following this line of attack, S.N. Ethier provides a statistical framework by which one can test for irregularities in the observed outcome of a roulette wheel. A similar weakness had also been reported in Time magazine in 12 February 1951. In this case, the report described various syndicates of gamblers exploiting determinism in the roulette wheel in the Argentinean casino Mar del Plata during 1948. The participants were colorfully described as a Nazi sailor and various “fruit hucksters, waiters and farmers”.

Using physics and computers

Henri Poincaré

The second type of exploit is more physical (that is, deterministic) than purely statistical and has consequently attracted the attention of several mathematicians, physicists and engineers. One of the first was Henri Poincaré in his seminal work Science and Method. While ruminating on the nature of chance, and that a small change in initial condition can lead to a large change in effect, Poincaré illustrated his thinking with the example of a roulette wheel (albeit a slightly different design from the modern version).

He observed that a tiny change in initial velocity would change the final resting place of the wheel (in his model there was no ball) such that the wager on an either black or red (as in a modern wheel, the black and red pockets alternate) would correspondingly win or lose. He concluded by arguing that this determinism was not important in the game of roulette as the variation in initial force was tiny, and for any continuous distribution of initial velocities, the result would be the same: effectively random, with equal probability. He was not concerned with the individual pockets, and he further assumed that the variation in initial velocity required to predict the outcome would be immeasurable. It is while describing the game of roulette that Poincaré introduces the concept of sensitivity to initial conditions, which is now a cornerstone of modern chaos theory.

The first roulette computer

A general procedure for predicting the outcome of a roulette spin, and an assessment of its utility was described by Edward Thorp in a 1969 publication for the Review of the International Statistical Institute. In that paper, Thorp describes the two basic methods of prediction. He observes (as others have done later) that by minimizing systematic bias in the wheel, the casinos achieve a mechanical perfection that can then be exploited using deterministic prediction schemes.

Get The Edge At Roulette How To Predict Where The Ball Will Landslide

He describes two deterministic prediction schemes (or rather two variants on the same scheme). If the roulette wheel is not perfectly level (a tilt of 0.2◦ was apparently sufficient — we verified that this is indeed more than sufficient) then there effectively is a large region of the frame from which the ball will not fall onto the spinning wheel. By studying Las Vegas wheels he observes this condition is meet in approximately one third of wheels. He claims that in such cases it is possible to garner a expectation of +15%, which increased to +44% with the aid of a ‘pocket-sized’ computer. Some time later, Thorp revealed that his collaborator in this endeavor was Claude Shannon17, the founding father of information theory.

Richard A. Epstein

In his 1967 book the mathematician Richard A. Epstein describes his earlier (undated) experiments with a private roulette wheel. By measuring the angular velocity of the ball relative to the wheel he was able to predict correctly the half of the wheel into which the ball would fall. Importantly, he noted that the initial velocity (momentum) of the ball was not critical. Moreover, the problem is simply one of predicting when the ball will leave the outer (fixed rim) as this will always occur at a fixed velocity. However, a lack of sufficient computing resources meant that his experiments were not done in real time, and certainly not attempted within a casino.

The Eudaemons

Subsequent to, and inspired by, the work of Thorp and Shannon, another widely described attempt to beat the casinos of Las Vegas was made in 1977-1978 by Doyne Farmer, Norman Packard and colleagues, who’s team was called “The Eudaemons“. It is supposed that Thorp’s 1969 paper had let the cat out of the bag regarding profitable betting on roulette. However, despite the assertions of Bass, Thorp’s paper is not mathematically detailed (there is in fact no equations given in the description of roulette). Thorp is sufficiently detailed to leave the reader in no doubt that the scheme could work, but also vague enough so that one could not replicate his effort without considerable knowledge and skill.

Farmer, Packard and colleagues implemented the system on a 6502 microprocessor hidden in a shoe and proceeded to apply their method to the various casinos of the Las Vegas Strip. The exploits of this group are described in detail in Bass. The same group of physicists went on to apply their skills to the study of chaotic dynamical systems and also for profitable trading on the financial markets. In Farmer and Sidorowich’s landmark paper on predicting chaotic time series the authors attribute the inspiration for that work to their earlier efforts to beat the game of roulette.

The Ritz casino attack

Less exalted individuals have also been employing similar schemes, in some cases fairly recently. In 2004, the BBC carried the report of three gamblers (described only as “a Hungarian woman and two Serbian men”) arrested by police after winning £1,300,000 at the Ritz Casino in London. The trio had apparently been using a laser scanner and their mobile phones to predict the likely resting place of the ball. Happily, for the trio but not the casino, they were judged to have broken no laws and allowed to keep their winnings.

The physics approach

In their 2012 paper, Predicting the outcome of roulette, Michael Small and Chi Kong TseThe come to these conclusions:

First, deterministic predictions of the outcome of a game of roulette can be made, and can probably be done in situ. Hence, the tales of various exploits in this arena are likely to be based on fact.

Second, the margin for profit is quite slim. Minor manipulation with the frictional resistance or level of the wheel and/or the manner in which the croupier actually plays the ball (the force with which the ball is rolled and the effect, for example, of axial spin of the ball) have not been explored here and would likely affect the results significantly.

Hence, for the casino the news is mostly good. Minor adjustments will ameliorate the advantage of the physicist-gambler. For the gambler, one can rest assured that the game is on some level predictable and therefore inherently honest.